Elsevier Patient Research Beta Contact Us | Terms & Conditions | Privacy Policy | About

Elsevier is the world's leading publisher of Medical Information. We are proud to make available our Patient Research option as a Beta program for patients, or friends/family of patients, who have a medical need for information regarding a medical situation for them or someone they know. This Beta program provides the article you request for free, with a small handling fee, $4.95. After ordering the article and confirmation of payment, we will e-mail the document to you typically within 2 hours, but no longer than 24 hours.

Development of methods for beam angle optimization for IMRT using an accelerated exhaustive search strategy
International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics, Volume 60, Issue 4, 15 November 2004, Pages 1325-1337

Abstract: PurposeThe purpose of this article is to explore the use of the accelerated exhaustive search strategy for developing and validating methods for optimizing beam orientations for intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT). Combining beam-angle optimization (BAO) with intensity distribution optimization is expected to improve the quality of IMRT treatment plans. However, BAO is one of the most difficult problems to solve adequately because of the huge hyperspace of possible beam configurations (e.g., selecting 7 of 36 uniformly spaced coplanar beams would require the intercomparison of 8,347,680 IMRT plans).Methods and materialsAn “influence vector” (IV) approximation technique for high-speed estimation of IMRT dose distributions was used in combination with a fast gradient search algorithm (Newton's method) for IMRT optimization. In the IV approximation, it is assumed that the change in intensity of a ray (or bixel) proportionately changes dose along the ray. Evidence is presented that the IV approximation is valid for BAO. The scatter contribution at points away from the ray is accounted for fully in IMRT optimization after the optimum beam orientation has been determined. IVs for all candidate beam angles are generated before the start of optimization. For all subsets of beams selected from a given pool of beams (e.g., 5 of 24 uniformly spaced beams), the distribution of planning scores for the best and the worst plans, optimum angle distributions, dose distributions, and dose–volume histograms (DVH) were analyzed for one prostate and two lung cancer cases. The results of the exhaustive search technique were used to develop a “multiresolution” search strategy. In this approach, a smaller number of beams (e.g., three) is first used to explore the hyperspace of solutions to determine the most preferred and the least preferred directions. The results of such exploration are then used as a starting point for determining an optimum configuration comprising a larger number of beams (e.g., seven). This two-step process is considerably faster than full exhaustive search. The question to be answered was whether the two methods lead to the same or similar solutions. The results of exhaustive search and multiresolution approaches were also compared with a previously published approach that used beam's-eye-view dosimetrics (BEVD).ResultsThe relative ranks of plans optimized by an accurate dose calculation method were highly correlated with those of the plans optimized by the fast calculation method (i.e., using the IV approximation), which suggests that an approximate dose calculation algorithm can be used effectively for ranking of plans during BAO. We found that dose distributions and DVH of many beam configurations within a specified subset from a given pool of beams (e.g., 5 of 18) may be clinically indistinguishable and acceptable. Their optimized IMRT scores fall in a narrow range, although beam configurations and dose distributions may be different. We used the frequency distributions as a function of beam angles for the best 100 and the worst 100 plans to determine the most and the least preferred beam angles. We found that the most and the least preferred angle distributions for 3 of 18 configurations were very similar to those for 5, 6, 7, or 8 of 18 or 24 configurations, but the size of the search space was much smaller for the 3 of 18 case. Using fewer than three beams was discovered to be inadequate. This information was used to select the most preferred angles and eliminate the least preferred ones before searching for the optimum angles for the remaining beams. For the cases we studies, the multiresolution strategy produced very similar results to the full exhaustive search. Based on the observation that the worst plans had at least one parallel-opposed pair of beams and virtually all of the best plans had none, we were able to further reduce the size of the search space dramatically by using a pool of only nonparallel-opposed equispaced beams (i.e., 7 of 19 instead of 7 of 36). Another observation was that the probability of finding an optimum configuration in a smaller beam pool is substantially lower than in a larger pool (e.g., 5 of 18 vs. 5 of 24). The implication of this BAO is not very important when a large number of beams (nine or more) is used and vice versa. Our results showed that the plans with fewer but optimally placed beams could be as good as or better than plans using a larger number of unoptimized or uniformly placed beams.ConclusionExhaustive search with fast IMRT algorithms provides a novel and realistic approach to study the characteristics of IMRT dose distributions as a function of beam angles and to design practical BAO strategies for IMRT planning.

This Beta program is not intended for use by Medical Professionals. To obtain this document through the Patient Research option you must have a medical need, only use the document for personal use, and agree to all the terms and conditions below. Also, these articles can be obtained for free at your local public or university hospital library. We encourage you to use this as a means of obtaining articles of interest to you.

Patient Research Terms and Conditions

The terms and conditions set out below govern your use of the content made available through this web-site (the "Site"), including the article or articles that you have selected in connection with your personal medical research (the "Content") for delivery to the e-mail address you will be asked to provide in connection with this service (collectively, the "Service"). In order to provide this Service you understand and agree to provide the personal information you will be asked to provide after you accept these terms and conditions, although our use of such information will be limited to this purpose and otherwise governed by our privacy policy (see Privacy Policy). The Content, the Site and the Service are provided by Elsevier Inc. and its affiliates and licensors (collectively "Elsevier"). For further information about Elsevier or to contact us, see Contact Us.

Permitted Uses

You may access in a given twenty-four hour period a reasonable number of Content items, and you may download and print such Content after it has been delivered to your e-mail address. Such access and use is for your own personal use, although you may also share and discuss such Content with family members and medical professionals involved in your medical care or the care of a family member. You can make further copies for such family members and medical professionals.

Prohibited Uses

Personal use does not include the use by researchers, instructors or students for research purposes or educational use.

You may not copy, display, distribute, modify, publish, reproduce, store, transmit, create derivative works from, or sell or license all or any part of the Content, or any other information obtained from or accessed through this Service in any medium to anyone. You may not modify in any way the text of the Content.

You may not use any robots, spiders, crawlers or other automated downloading programs or devices to: (i) continuously and automatically search or index the Site or the Content, unless authorized by us; (ii) harvest personal information from this web site for purposes of sending unsolicited or unauthorized material; or (iii) cause disruption to the working of the Service or this Site.

You may not use the Service or this Site to publish or distribute any advertising, promotional material, or solicitation to other users to use any goods or services.

Copyright Notice

All Content provided through this Service, and the Site layout, design, images, programs, text and other information displayed, are the property of Elsevier and is protected by copyright and other intellectual property laws.

Warranty

We will use reasonable efforts to respond to your requests for Content items and to maintain the indexes and other services involved in providing this Service and Site.

Disclaimer of Warranties and Liability

We make no other warranty whatsoever, including without limitation, that the operation of the Service or this Site will be uninterrupted or error-free; that defects will be corrected; that this Site, including the server that makes it available, is free of viruses or other harmful components; as to the results that may be obtained from use of the Content or other materials on the Site; or as to the accuracy, completeness, reliability, availability, suitability, quality, non-infringement or operation of any Content, product or service provided on or accessible from the Site.

THIS SERVICE, SITE AND ALL CONTENT, PRODUCTS AND SERVICES INCLUDED IN OR ACCESSIBLE FROM THIS SITE ARE PROVIDED "AS IS" AND WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR REPRESENTATIONS OF ANY KIND (EXPRESS, IMPLIED AND STATUTORY, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE WARRANTIES OF TITLE AND NONINFRINGEMENT AND THE IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE), ALL OF WHICH NAME DISCLAIMS TO THE FULLEST EXTENT PERMITTED BY LAW. YOUR USE OF THE SITE IS AT YOUR SOLE RISK.

To the extent permissible under applicable laws, no responsibility is assumed for any injury and/or damage to persons, animals or property as a matter of products liability, negligence or otherwise, or from any use or operation of any ideas, instructions, methods, products or procedures contained in the Content or on this Site. If the Content items provided through the Service provide information about medical diagnoses and treatment, it is intended for professional use within the medical field. No suggested test or procedure should be carried out unless, in the judgment of a medical professional, its risk is justified. Because of rapid advances in the medical sciences, we recommend that the independent verification of diagnoses and drug dosages should be made. Discussions, views, and recommendations as to medical procedures, products, choice of drugs, and drug dosages are the responsibility of the authors.

WE SHALL NOT BE LIABLE TO YOU OR ANYONE ELSE FOR ANY LOSS OR INJURY, CAUSED IN WHOLE OR PART BY ITS NEGLIGENCE OR CONTINGENCIES BEYOND ITS CONTROL IN PROCURING, COMPILING, INTERPRETING, REPORTING OR DELIVERING INFORMATION THROUGH THE SITE. IN NO EVENT WILL WE BE LIABLE TO YOU OR ANYONE ELSE FOR ANY DECISION MADE OR ACTION TAKEN BY YOU IN RELIANCE ON SUCH INFORMATION. WE SHALL NOT BE LIABLE TO YOU OR ANYONE ELSE FOR ANY DAMAGES (INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, CONSEQUENTIAL, SPECIAL, INCIDENTAL, INDIRECT, OR SIMILAR DAMAGES) EVEN IF ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGES.

Governing Law and Venue

These terms and conditions shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of New York, without regard to its conflicts of law principles. You hereby submit to and agree that the sole jurisdiction and venue for any actions that may arise under or in relation to the subject matter hereof shall be the courts located in the State of New York.

Last revised: 10/2006

I have read and agree to the terms and conditions above

 

Copyright © 2007 Elsevier Inc.
All rights reserved.
Contact Us | Terms & Conditions | Privacy Policy | About